Milo's Right! That's What's So Wrong!
The fundamental problem for Milo's sympathizers is that he emphatically did not go too far.
The fundamental problem for Milo's sympathizers is that he emphatically did not go too far.
"You couldn't turn away." So said Fox News analyst Howard Kurtz about President Trump's one hour, 16-minute news conference at the White House on Thursday.
This past Saturday, more than a million people turned out nationwide to demonstrate against President Donald Trump and his nationalist agenda.
Lawrence Krauss, professor at Arizona State University, recently opined in The New Yorker that the Trump administration is declaring a "war on science."
It is the waning of this secular vision of life that is perhaps the most significant indicator of Trump's win.
While a worldwide caliphate is ISIS's goal, we can look to recent studies to illuminate the potential political consequences of such terrorist acts.
Recently, across the nation, Sunday was a day of ritual. No, I'm not talking about church liturgies; I'm referencing rather to the demonstrations staged by a number of National Football League players during the national anthem.
Patrick Henry College recently brought more honor to the exciting renewal of classical education nationwide.
But was this really such a historical moment? In fact, was this even really history?
In a recent article for USA Today, political pundit Kirsten Powers argued that conservative white evangelicals support Trump "because they are mad that they can't impose their worldview on the rest of the country, whether it relates to gays and lesbians, transgender people and non-whites."