Recommended

Jim Jordan blasts Microsoft over censorship of posts critical of China, Hunter Biden

Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, speaks during an Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee hearing on 'Online platforms and market power. Examining the dominance of Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple' on Capitol Hill on July 29, 2020, in Washington, D.C.
Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, speaks during an Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee hearing on "Online platforms and market power. Examining the dominance of Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple" on Capitol Hill on July 29, 2020, in Washington, D.C. | Graeme Jennings - Pool/Getty Images

Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio has accused Microsoft of censoring posts critical of China and Hunter Biden on its search engine Bing and on LinkedIn and urging users of Microsoft Word to use "gender-neutral" language. 

In a letter addressed to Microsoft President Brad Smith, Jordan said major technology companies, including Microsoft, were “out to get conservatives,” adding that its exertion of "editorial control over user-generated content" was "Orwellian."

He pointed to its control over the content in its platforms, including Linkedin and the search engine Bing, as examples. 

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

Regarding Bing, Jordan said the search engine censored results about “Tank Man,” the famous civilian dissident from the Tiananmen Square protests.

"On behalf of the Chinese Communist Party, Microsoft has censored Bing search
engine results of Tank Man on the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests — including
results for users in the United States — and has muzzled the voices of China critics on LinkedIn."

Also on Linkedin, Jordan pointed to instances in which the site censored negative news reports about President Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and a post about an "official U.S. Senate committee report" on his dealings in Ukraine, as well as posts about COVID-19's origins at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Jordan said Linkedin also "removed a post that linked to a study challenging prevailing liberal views on climate change."

The congressman also criticized House Democrats, who he argued had failed to properly examine “Microsoft’s conduct during their investigation of competition in digital markets.”

“It is unclear why Microsoft has avoided significant attention from House Democrats. The Democrats’ investigation excluded Microsoft from significant oversight and the Democrats’ recently introduced bills include a definition of a ‘covered platform’ that could be read to exclude Microsoft,” continued Jordan.

Jordan called on Congress to, among other things, look into why Microsoft was “censoring user content” about Hunter Biden’s alleged scandals, the possible origins of COVID-19, and other issues.

Jordan is the top-ranking Republican member of the House Judiciary Committee, with his letter coming as legislation is being considered to look into modifying antitrust laws in ways that would impact tech giants Facebook, Amazon, Google and Apple, according to CNBC.

His letter, however, is not without its critics, as the libertarian-leaning publication Reason magazine critiqued the congressman's claims, labeling them a “flimsy crusade.”

In a column published Tuesday, Reason's senior editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown wrote that Jordan’s accusations against Microsoft “largely rests on a few anecdotes about Microsoft-owned LinkedIn suppressing posts about Joe Biden's son Hunter, recent executive orders, or COVID-19.”

She added that while one or two posts criticizing Hunter Biden were taken down, many others were never censored, opening the possibility for other explanations for their removal.

“Jordan's argument is simply that Microsoft may have made a handful of content moderation decisions he doesn't like, so federal meddling is warranted,” she wrote.

Brown did agree with Jordan that “it is strange that Microsoft has been so absent from today's overreaching antitrust revival.”

“Though Microsoft was the bête noire of antitrust zealots in the 1990s and early '00s … it has largely escaped the wrath of today's crusaders against tech companies,” continued Brown.

“Back then, the company had cultural cache and rising power. Today, it's still a powerhouse but it doesn't stir culture war sentiment the same way, say, Facebook and Google do.”

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.